Heaven on Earth

Take a minute and think about what heaven on earth would be like. Consider what Eden might have been like before the fall of humanity. Can you imagine litter or pollution there? Can you imagine using chemicals to kill bugs and weeds? Can you imagine someone losing their temper and yelling at someone else? Can you imagine low quality, disposable products? Can you imagine landfills? Can you imagine democracies? War? Denominations? Cancer? Genetic modification? I cannot imagine these things existing or occurring in heaven on earth. Instead, the first image that comes to mind is a quiet, gentle approach to living, to humanity, and to all of creation. This posture of heart and mind is exemplified for me in the characters of a few movies and television programs: Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, Into Great Silence, Star Trek Insurrection, Star Trek The Inner Light, The Mission, and A River Runs Through It. It is this posture of heart and mind that caused St. Francis to gently move the earthworm off the walking path so as to not be crushed, to preach the gospel to the birds, and to tame the wolf of Gubio.

Are you even trying to live in heaven on earth? How difficult it can be to foster or maintain this posture of heart and mind in such a hectic, fast-paced, demanding, hostile, western world! How especially difficult when we don't make the effort to quiet ourselves daily!

Sustainability and Charitable Donations

Is was re-reading some of my journals from 10 years ago when I visited some refugee centers in Johannesburg, and they reminded me of some thoughts that I've had recently about some charitable donations, as well. We are often given a barrage of pleas for financial help for the poor, whether it is local or in another country, financial help that will be spent on food, clothing, medical supplies, and schooling. Often times, over 95% of the donations actually make it to the recipients. What has happened, through, in many cases is that the recipients have come to think of themselves as poor and perpetually in need of donations in order to survive. The problem with this is that it is not a sustainable plan. With some creativity, leadership, and education, I believe that most if not all of these situations can be turned around into short term projects that kick start systems and programs that enable the recipients to provide for themselves. Many of these kick starter projects can be completed in less than 1 year, some might take as long as 5 years. Once these kick starter projects are completed, the recipients have the potential to contribute significantly to the the world and to the kingdom of heaven on earth.

The alternative to this that I propose is to have a set of criteria for these programs and have them audited for following the criteria. The criteria could be something like this:

• limited time (max 5 years) and a dollar cap on donations and NGO presence in the program
• approved plan for how the program will build to self-sufficiency after the donations stop
• production of goods as a community
• education of recipients
• production of communities own food and water filtration strongly encouraged
• environmental friendliness encouraged
• sanitation and housing can expand and be provided by recipients
• follow appropriate technology guidelines, e.g. E.F. Schumacher
• feedback mechanism in place for soliciting and implementing improvements

As an example, let's take a look at the refugee situation in South Africa 10 years ago. Refugees from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and from southern Sudan were streaming into South Africa, and the South African government allowed them to enter and stay. However, the government did not provide any funding to pay for food or shelter for these refugees, which was also appropriate. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) took on the responsibility and many of these NGOs tried to incorporate education into their programs. The programs were not coordinated between NGOs, and each NGO was had staff attempting to raise funds (compete for funds in some cases) from the United States, the United Nations, and from Europe.

Using the alternative methodology proposed above, an NGO could draft plans for new villages of refugees in South Africa, built by the refugees who are fed for the first year with moneys from donations, and who in turn create an extensive organic farm that provides all of the food that the community needs. Each village would take care of its own recycling and composting, creating no landfills. Each village could focus on a particular craft, such as leather work, wood carving, hand-made clothing, or the like, and setup the [low tech] equipment for producing these crafts. The NGO could setup the initial agreements for foreign trade of these crafts to be sold in the host country and in other countries. The NGO could then pull out of the villages within 2 years, after ensuring that leadership is developed from among the refugees and that everything is working well.

Pay It Forward, Part 3

The non-profit company mentioned in the previous post, Pay It Forward Part 2, could focus on sustainable low-cost housing. The houses could be improved houses that are pre-existing, or they could be new houses built with sustainable materials and processes. A good goal to strive for would be a sustainable home for under $40,000. They would be sold on a rent-to-buy basis, with no interest and no profit.

Some of the improvements that could be targeted:

• Remove metal plumbing, recycle it, replace with PEX for supply lines and PVC for drains
• Replace old wiring with new
• Low-E windows
• Radiant floor heat
• Additional thermal capacity in increase passive solar gain in winter
• Southern glazing for additional solar gain in winter
• Tankless water heater
• Energy star appliances
• Zero VOC pain
• Organic vegetable gardens and orchard
• Chicken coop
• Rabbit run
• Non-asphault roof
• Rain water catchment system
• Gray water system
• Compost bins, vermiculture bins
• Masonry Heaters / Rocket Stoves
• Set of books and videos on how to manage it all

Some possible construction methods if building a new house:

• Cob
• Timber Frame
• Straw Bale
• Geodesic Dome
• Earthship
• Bermed or Underground
• Slipform Masonry
• Rubble Trench Foundation
• Earthen Floors

Pay It Forward, Part 2

Take the concept in the previous post, Pay It Forward Part 1, and manage it with a non-profit company.  The company could be formed with volunteer-only staff, with no brick-and-mortar offices to minimize expenses.  The non-profit could act as the property holder and organizer for the 0% interest rent-to-buy arrangements described in the previous post.  A small extra fee or a deposit could be kept for emergency repairs (e.g. after eviction), a legal defense fund, and insurance.  Agreements with buyers would need to be airtight and the buyers would need to have 100% responsibility for repairs and maintenance. Standards would need to be developed for the houses purchased, similar to HUD and FHA.